|
|
Rohnert
Park
Is the Wal-Mart Way the American Way?
Martin J. Bennett, Dollars and Sense
March-April 2011
"We need to uphold the law, we need to
apply the law and we need to allow this project to
move forward. I believe that not to do so would be
un-American." So stated Rohnert Park (Sonoma County,
California) City Councilwoman Amy Breeze last year
when the council voted to approve a controversial
Wal-Mart supercenter-despite a year long campaign
against the project by a broad coalition of labor,
environmental, and community organizations.
The Living Wage Coalition of
Sonoma County challenges Ms. Breeze's definition of
Americanism. Though we respect her point of view, we
think she is dead wrong. Wal-Mart, we believe, has
betrayed fundamental American values. As the largest
retailer and private employer in America, no other
company has such a profound impact upon our economy
and labor markets. It is time for Wal-Mart to
change, or face a growing opposition to its plan to
build at least one supercenter in every county of
California.
Click here for the rest of the story
For more about the anti-Wal-Mart
superstore campaign in Sonoma, click here
http://www.livingwagesonoma.org
Lawsuit seeks to stop Wal-Mart expansion
By JEREMY HAY - THE
PRESS DEMOCRAT
September 15, 2010
Foes of a Wal-Mart
Supercenter have sued Rohnert Park, challenging the
City Council’s approval in August of the company’s
application to expand in its Redwood Drive location.
In the lawsuit, the Sierra
Club and Sonoma County Conservation Action argue
that the council’s decision effectively violated the
land use policies outlined in the city’s general
plan, which calls for encouraging supermarkets to be
“close to where people live.”
The general plan is
“essentially a legally binding document, it’s almost
like a constitution for the city, and the City
Council doesn’t have the right to abrogate it,” said
Rick Luttmann, a Sonoma State University professor
and a Sonoma County Conservation Action member.
Click here for the rest of the story
City Council Approves
Wal-Mart Supercenter Wal-Mart
Opponents Called "Un-American"
by Al Norman
Wal-Mart Watch, August 2, 2010
On May 10, 2009,
Sprawl-Busters reported that a newspaper poll in
Rohnert Park, California indicated that the public
is losing enthusiasm for big box stores.
The Santa Rosa Press
Democrat reported that its readers were "generally
opposed to many of the pending big-box plans in
Sonoma County, including a proposed Lowe's in Santa
Rosa and a Wal-Mart expansion in Rohnert Park."
54% of readers opposed a
plan by Wal-Mart to expand its Rohnert Park store on
Redwood Drive by 32,000 s.f., and another 12% were
unsure.
Only 34% supported
Wal-Mart's expansion plans. "Please, we do not need
an expanded Wal-Mart in Rohnert Park," wrote a
Rohnert Park resident. "I never go to that store."
Click here for the rest of the story
Is Courtroom Next Stop in
Wal-Mart Fight?
by Jeremy Hay
Santa Rosa Press Democrat
July 31, 2010
A day after the Rohnert Park
City Council gave the go ahead for the controversial
expansion of Wal-Mart, divisions remained razor
sharp over the proposed supercenter.
The council late Thursday
overturned - and sharply rebuked - an April vote by
the city Planning Commission, which had unanimously
rejected the application by Wal-Mart, the world's
biggest retailer, to add a grocery to its Redwood
Drive store.
"The Planning Commission
didn't do their job and shame on them,"
Councilman Joe Callinan said
in supporting the supercenter near the end of a 5
?-hour meeting that drew hundreds of people to City
Hall.
The commission had worried
about the effect on other Rohnert Park grocery
stores and said the expansion would be inconsistent
with a section of the city's general plan that calls
for encouraging supermarkets to be "close to where
people live."
But the council, in a 4-1
vote with Councilman Jake Mackenzie opposed, said
the project's benefits were greater than its
potential negative impacts and the project was
consistent with city land use policies.
Click here for the rest of the story
Walmart OK Sets Up Grocery Battle Line
by Nicholas Grizzle
Rohnert Park Community Voice
July 30, 2010
Council
Overturns Planning Commission Decision to Deny
35,000 sq. ft. Expansion Into Super Center
Onlookers
peer into council chambers through locked doors at
Thursday night’s special meeting of the Rohnert Park
City Council. The council met to decide the fate of
Walmart’s expansion into a super center, drawing
hundreds of people to the meeting, most of whom
spoke to the council on the issue.
The Rohnert
Park City Council approved Walmart’s expansion into
a super center at a special meeting Thursday night.
“People say,
‘Don’t be afraid to do what’s the right thing,’ and
unfortunately you could hear here tonight, this is a
very divided issue,” said Mayor Pam Stafford. “There
was no overwhelming feeling one way or the other,
but even if there was one overwhelming feeling over
the other, that’s not how we get to decide this
issue... we have to do it based on the law.
“All our
legal and staff reports have told us this is
consistent with our General Plan.”
With that, the council voted to repeal the planning
commission’s decision, thereby allowing Walmart to
expand into a super center, adding 35,000 sq. ft.
and including a full grocery store.
“I can’t see where the benefits will not outweigh
the significant impacts. I think the benefits are
much greater,” said council member Joe Callinan.
“We have been preaching economic development, and we
have one of our biggest sales tax companies in
Rohnert Park wanting to expand, I think we would
look really silly if we didn’t agree with that.”
Reading from a paper, council member Amie Breeze
said, “Both of these businesses are part of our
community, by my definition, this makes them both
local.” She added, “I feel confident that from the
reports we have read... there are benefits to this
project that do outweigh the significant
environmental impacts.”
Council
member Jake Mackenzie, the city’s longest standing
council member, was the single naysayer in the
votes. “I would like to have seen... actual evidence
that supports that there will be sales tax revenue
increases to this city... or any overall increase in
jobs to Rohnert Park.”
His lone
“no” echoed in the otherwise silent city hall.
After
recollecting the vote regarding the proposed casino
just outside city limits, during the vote Thursday
night he said, “I would like to point out to this
council that I personally believe there are grounds
for legal action to be taken in this matter.”
Vice-Mayor Gina Belforte said she did not appreciate
the tactics used to sway public opinion in this
debate, citing a flyer saying the council was
“bulleyed” into voting for the expansion and her
personal cell phone number distributed for residents
to call with their comments. She stressed, however,
that this did not sway her vote.
“I do believe this will drive economic development,”
she said. “I do see this as a benefit for the city
as well.” She continued, “I don’t think the city
council should, in any way, decide which businesses
we choose and which businesses we don’t choose.”
Before public comment, which was extensive at the
five-hour meeting, representatives from Walmart were
given 15 minutes to present their case. They touched
on sales tax revenue, the potential closing of
Pacific Market and interpretation of the city’s
General Plan, which was cited in the planning
commission’s denial.
According to Angie Stoner, spokeswoman for Walmart,
the Rohnert Park store generated $600,000 in sales
tax revenue last year. If this is a total number,
which Walmart was unable to confirm before deadline,
Rohnert Park’s share would be about 11 percent of
that, or $66,000. The share of sales tax revenue
increases to about 16 percent after a voter-approved
sales tax increase goes into effect in October.
Regarding a possible increase in sales tax revenue
from the grocery expansion, Stoner said, “According
to the California Board of Equalization, our
American Canyon store experienced an increase of
35.4 percent in taxable retail sales since a Walmart
store with groceries opened there in 2007.”
A
35 percent sales tax revenue increase coupled with
Rohnert Park’s sales tax increase would mean about
$127,000 annually, or almost double the revenue the
city currently receives. But the expansion will not
be complete for a couple years and Measure E, the
sales tax increase, expires in five years. Stoner
did not supply data or say where her sales tax
figures came from.
With about 80 extra seats in the lobby and 40
outside, police were keeping a strict count on the
number of people inside city hall. Standing room
only would be an understatement. A speaker was set
up outside for overflow attendance. One city
employee estimated 100 speaker cards turned in, each
given two minutes to say their peace.
Many were from out of town, but a significant
portion were RP or Cotati residents. Many were
objecting to or agreeing with Walmart based on
ideological principals.
Marty Bennett, Co-Chair of the Living Wage Coalition
of Sonoma County said before the meeting, “Walmart
would like to put a super center in every county,”
but the impact to local markets would be
detrimental. “One super center equals all retail
wages in the county going down by 1 percent.”
The organization, “the leading opponent of the
project,” Bennett said, would oppose the same
project in any city in the region. “The regional
impact will go far beyond Rohnert Park,” he said.
Steve Butler, a Santa Rosa attorney representing
Pacific Market, said, “I do believe (the Walmart
expansion) is contrary to your General Plan...
(which) states ‘maintain land use patterns that
maximize residents’ accessibility to neighborhood
shopping centers.’ I would respectfully submit that
this project would clearly violate that policy as
well as other transit and air quality policies of
your General Plan.”
City Engineer Darrin Jenkins confirmed after public
comment, however, that the project “is consistent
with the city’s General Plan policies.”
Pacific Market employees, and owner Ken Silveira
also spoke to the council, describing their bleak
situation. Silveria wrote a letter to the city
stating his store would close if Walmart was allowed
to expand. A study sponsored by the market also
showed the job loss and economic blight would be
significant if Pacific Market were to close, which
was likely if Walmart expanded to include a grocery
section roughly the size of Pacific Market.
But Stoner responded to these claims, saying, “We’ve
met with the owner of Pacific Market and proposed
multiple ways that we can assist in getting their
business on more solid ground over the next couple
years before an expanded store would open. They have
responded with silence.
Save for a request to be bought out.”
She added, “Though it is convenient to blame Walmart,
it is simply not true that our expansion will
ultimately determine the fate of their store here.”
Some comments from the public were emotional.
“I’d like to be able to buy my milk at a grocery
store a short distance to my house, I don’t want to
be standing in line next to some guy buying a gun at
Walmart,” said Suzanne Sanders of Rohnert Park.
Shirley Slack of Santa Rosa cited a list of items
currently available at Walmart for less than other
RP stores, saying, “In this economy, we need this
Walmart expansion.”
Crystal Robert, of Santa Rosa said she shops at the
Rohnert Park Walmart. “I just think that there
should be more opportunities for us lower income
families to be able to go to Walmart and find
everything that they need there.”
Jan Ogrin, who owns a business in Santa Rosa but
lives in RP, was awaiting the council’s decision as
a factor in where she would continue to locate her
business. “The decision you’re making tonight is
really a very major policy decision, and is speaking
of where your loyalty lies.”
She concluded, bluntly, “I’m here to find out if it
would be safe for me to consider moving my business
to Rohnert Park or should I stay in Santa Rosa.”
Wal-Mart Debate Heats Up:
Hundreds show up at City Hall to Weigh In On
Proposal To Add Grocery to Rohnert Park Store
by Paul Payne
Santa Rosa Press Democrat
July 30, 2010
A bid by Wal-Mart to open
what would be Sonoma County's first Supercenter by
adding a grocery to its Rohnert Park store was
hanging in the balance late Thursday night as
opponents and supporters argued their case before
the City Council.
"The only way Wal-Mart could
conceivably offer any monetary benefit to Rohnert
Park would be by cannibalizing the economies of the
surrounding communities," Healdsburg resident Robert
Neuse said.
Thomas Thunderhorse, a
Rohnert Park resident who described himself as a
low-income senior, said the council's decision would
have political consequences. "If this council votes
for the expansion of Wal-Mart, it will show those
people in need that you care for them," he said.
"If you vote against it, you
will be remembered by them."
Click here for the rest of the story
Opposition to
Wal-Mart Supercenters Building Across the Bay Area
By Martin J. Bennett
The Daily Censored
California Progress Report
July 26, 2010
The San Francisco Bay Area has become the epicenter
for contentious
battles in California to halt proposed Wal-Mart
supercenters that
sell both general merchandise and groceries.
Both the City of Antioch in Contra Costa County and
the City of
Rohnert Park in Sonoma County will consider
supercenter proposals
this week. The outcome could derail Wal-Mart's
strategy to build at
least one supercenter in each county of the state.
In April, the Rohnert Park Planning Commission
unanimously denied the
Wal-Mart proposal to enlarge its existing discount
store into a
supercenter. Wal-Mart has appealed the decision to
the city council.
Click here for the rest of the story
Go Local vs. Wal-Mart and Super-sized Chains
July 21, 2010
By Will Shonbrun
On July 29 the Rohnert Park City Council will
decide if it will
approve a proposal by Wal-Mart to expand its Rohnert
park store by
more than 40,000 square feet, becoming a super
center selling both
groceries and retail. Rohnert Park's Planning
Commission voted to
turn down Wal-Mart's proposal in April, but the
company appealed the
decision to the city counsel.
There are pros and cons regarding this massive
project though the
negatives far outweigh the positives. What can be
said in favor of
the proposal, and has been in a number of letters to
the Press
Democrat, is that it will provide a place for
inexpensive foods and
goods to many people on very limited incomes. It can
also be said
that it will provide more jobs in the community
though these are very
low-paying ones, most with no health benefits.
Counter to the argument for jobs gained is the
potential for jobs
lost by local businesses that might well be forced
to close; good
jobs paying decent wages and providing benefits,
such as Pacific
Market, Oliver's and other groceries, and the 50-60
local and
regional businesses that would be affected by their
closure. Just a
few of these local suppliers are Amy's Organics,
Alvarado Street
Bakery, Wildwood Natural Foods, Redwood Hill Farms,
Kozlowski Farms
and La Tortilla Factory. Nationally Wal-Marts has
wiped out thousands
of local businesses and their suppliers leading to
an urban decay in
neighborhood shopping centers where stores like
Pacific Market are
the anchor and draw for other small businesses.
Therefore the potential for jobs lost would far
surpass jobs gained.
Finally, in favor of the expansion it's argued that
it will increase
tax revenue for the city, but this is debatable.
Most of the
expansion will be for nontaxable food items, and
what the super
center might provide in increased tax revenue may
well be offset by
decreased tax money from affected local businesses.
Wal-Mart has become a retail behemoth by keeping
costs low: wages,
health benefits, reducing full timers to part time,
keeping unions
out and buying cheap goods from foreign sources.
Giants like
Wal-Marts have closed tens of thousands of local
independent
businesses nationally, including pharmacies,
hardware stores,
bookstores, groceries and other retailers.
According to a University of Missouri report
that examined 1,749
counties where Wal-Mart located and the resulting
loss of jobs were
taken into account, "The superstores contributed
just 30 jobs on
average" Furthermore, most of the dollars that go to
Wal-Mart stores
leave the local economy. A policy study authored by
Stacy Mitchell, a
senior researcher with the Institute for Local
Self-Reliance, cites a
report by the firm Civic Economics, which found
that, "Every $100
spent at an independent store generates $23 more in
local economic
activity than $100 spent at a chain."
In addition local businesses tend to be much more
community involved
than large out-of-state chains when it comes to
charitable
contributions and participation in community
services and
neighborhood organizations. Profits generated from
Wal-Marts go back
to corporate headquarters in Arkansas, whereas
locally generated
business revenue stays primarily in the community.
Wal-Mart Expansion A Threat to Transit-Oriented
Development
by Martin J. Bennett
Santa Rosa Press Democrat
Sunday, July 18, 2010
The Rohnert Park
Planning Commission unanimously denied a Wal-Mart
proposal to enlarge its existing discount store into
a supercenter
that sells both groceries and general merchandise.
Wal-Mart has
appealed the decision to the city council.
The economic and environmental impacts of a
supercenter will extend
far beyond the City of Rohnert Park. All county
residents should be
concerned about this proposal. The controversy
raises fundamental
questions about future growth and the necessity for
proactive city
and regional planning to promote equitable and
sustainable
development.
Development in the county is inevitable. According
to the Association
of Bay Area Governments, the population of Sonoma
County will
increase by twenty-three percent over the next
twenty years. In 2008,
voters approved a landmark initiative to meet this
challenge,
creating the two-county SMART train that will run on
tracks adjacent
to Highway 101 from Cloverdale to Larkspur. The
build-out of the
train system provides the opportunity for
city-centered
'transit-oriented development' (TOD) around the
fourteen SMART train
stations--development that could accommodate ninety
percent of the
projected population growth.
TOD is densely-built, mixed-use development within
one-half mile of
transit stations, accessible by bike and foot, and
with a variety of
retail, office, and small businesses. Through
land-use planning and
public funding, municipalities can promote
development near transit
stations that includes good jobs paying
family-supporting wages,
affordable housing for all income groups, open
space, and walkable
neighborhoods.
The proposed 170,000 square-foot Wal-Mart
supercenter located
one-quarter mile from the site of the planned
Rohnert Park SMART
train station is a direct threat to such careful and
appropriate
planning.
The labor, environmental, and local business
organizations opposing
the Wal-Mart supercenter believe it undermines
compact and equitable
development in Rohnert Park and violates the city's
general plan. The
project undercuts transit-oriented development's
efforts to reduce
low-wage work, support local business, tackle global
warming, and lay
the foundation for a robust regional economy.
Nearly one third of the employees in the county are
currently
'working poor' and do not earn self-sufficiency
wages. According to
the Insight Center for Community and Economic
Development in 2008,
two parents working full-time in Sonoma County must
each earn $14.90
an hour or $62,940 a year to pay for food, housing,
medical care,
child care, and transportation.
Sonoma State economist Robert Eyler reports that the
supercenter will
contribute to job quality decline and increase the
problem of working
poverty. According to his analysis, the county will
lose105-211
jobs---mostly good jobs that pay hourly wages for
full-time workers
ranging from $17.67 per hour at Pacific Market to
$23.36 at Raley's
and Safeway. The Wal-Mart super center will employ
450 workers, and
according to the company, the typical full-time
worker at Wal-Mart
earns $12.10 an hour.
With regard to global warming, the supercenter will
have adverse
effects on air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.
In order to
comply with AB 32, a 2006 state legislative measure,
all nine cities
and the county have pledged to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions
twenty-five percent by 2015. However, the Eyler
report notes, Pacific
Market will close if the supercenter is built, and
its 8,000
customers will drive an extra 28,400 miles each week
to shop for
groceries.
Further, Stacy Mitchell, author of Big Box Swindle,
reports that
vehicle miles driven per customer will increase
because a supercenter
draws shoppers from a greater distance than a
discount store. Indeed,
since Wal-Mart's rapid expansion in the late 1970s,
miles traveled
per household to shop has skyrocketed by three
hundred percent, while
total household driving increased by seventy- five
percent.
As for local business, there are sixty local
suppliers that provide
produce and merchandise to Pacific Market, and more
than seventy
supply Oliver's in Cotati. Wal-Mart suppliers, on
the other hand, are
nearly 100% national and global firms (and that
means increased truck
traffic into the county). The 'Go Local' movement
has demonstrated
that patronizing local businesses ensures that more
dollars remain in
the community. Studies by Civic Economics
demonstrate that
locally-owned firms produce two to three times more
economic activity
within the local economy than national chains
---including
locally-retained profits, wages paid to local
residents, purchases
from local suppliers, and contributions to local
nonprofits.
The Rohnert Park City Council should uphold the
decision of the
planning commission, reject the Wal-Mart
supercenter, and refocus the
city's planning process to promote sustainable
economic development.
Martin J. Bennett teaches American history at Santa
Rosa Junior
College and serves as Co-Chair of the Living Wage
Coalition. He is a
board member of Sonoma County Conservation Action
and the North Bay
Labor Council.
Dept. of Social Science
Santa Rosa Junior College
1501 Mendocino Ave.
Santa Rosa, Ca.
95401
(707) 527-4873 Office
(707) 522-2755 Fax
(707) 939-8933 Home Office
KPFA Morning Show
Wednesday, July 7th: Bay Area anti-Wal-Mart
Superstore campaigns
Living Wage
Coalition Co-Chair Paul Kaplan and California
Healthy Communities Network Executive Director Phil
Tucker were interviewed by labor journalist David
Bacon on the KPFA Morning Show today, Wednesday,
July 7th. The segment focused on Bay Area
anti-Wal-Mart superstore campaigns in the cities of
Rohnert Park, Milpitas, and Antioch.
To hear the program click on the link below and
scroll about one-half hour into the KPFA Morning
Show.
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/show/46
June 30, 2010
-- No Wal-Mart Supercenter in Rohnert Park!!
City Council to Consider Wal-Mart Expansion
Thursday, July 29th
On Thursday, July 29th, the Rohnert Park City
Council will consider the appeal by Wal-Mart to
expand their existing discount store to become a
supercenter selling both groceries and retail
merchandise. On April 22nd, the Rohnert Park
planning commission by a unanimous 4-0 vote,
rejected the proposed Wal-Mart expansion because the
project does not conform to the city's general plan.
.
Please attend this meeting at 6 pm at City Hall, 130
Avram Ave., Rohnert Park, to demonstrate your
opposition to the proposed supercenter. Arrive as
early as 4 pm to ensure a seat in the council
chambers. Food and entertainment will be provided
for those who arrive early. There will be overflow
seating outside the city council chamber and a video
monitor for those who arrive later. This is a
special meeting just on the Wal-Mart expansion
proposal, and the council will accommodate all who
wish to speak for 3 minutes.
Who Opposes the Wal-Mart Supercenter?
A coalition of community organizations and concerned
citizens has formed to oppose the Wal-Mart
supercenter that includes: Living Wage Coalition of
Sonoma County, Go Local Sonoma County, Sonoma County
Conservation Action, Sierra Club Sonoma Group,
Sonoma County Latino Democratic Club, Peace and
Justice Center of Sonoma County, North Bay Labor
Council, California Healthy Communities Network,
California Faculty Association Sonoma State chapter,
and the Sonoma State University Academic Senate.
Support the Rohnert Park Planning Commission
Decision to Just Say No to the Wal-Mart Supercenter
Expansion
The event is free and wheelchair accessible
For more information on the issue and the meeting go
to:
www.livingwagesonoma.org
To contact the Living Wage Coalition, email:
livingwagesoco@gmail.com
or
call (707) 623-7395
Wal-Mart takes another
run at Rohnert Park expansion
By
JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Published: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 4:09 p.m.
Wal-Mart, the
giant retailer whose bid to supersize its
Rohnert Park store by adding a grocery section
was rejected by the city's Planning Commission,
has appealed that decision to the City Council.
The appeal
states that the project is ”fully consistent
with the General Plan” and argues that the
commission was wrong to turn down the
project.
Wal-Mart
spokeswoman Angela Stoner, who represented
the Arkansas-based company at the
commission's decisive April hearing, did not
respond Wednesday to calls seeking comment.
Opponents
quickly vowed to mount an assault on the
application similar to the one that
succeeded in April — arguing the expansion
will push more workers out of jobs than it
will create, and that any jobs that might be
created at Wal-Mart would be low-paying
jobs.
Click here for the rest of the story
GUEST OPINION:
The hidden costs of Wal-Mart's plans for RP store
April 28, 2010
Press Democrat
This expansion adds a
grocery component, and the Rohnert Park's City
Council, which will soon review the plan, will
likely focus on the assumed sales tax generation and
job creation such an expansion will provide.
It is important to
recognize that an expansion of mainly grocery items
will not generate a large amount of additional sales
tax revenue, and the assumed loss of Pacific Market
could lead to fewer jobs, reduced tax revenues, less
consumer choice and create a significant vacancy
problem at Mountain Shadows Plaza.
Click here for the rest of the story
Walmart
expansion EIR rejected by RP planning commission,
4-0
The Community Voice
By Jud Snyder April 23,
2010 10:45 am
By a 4-0 vote, Rohnert
Park's Planning Commission turned thumbs down on an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) from Walmart to
add another 35,256 sq. ft. to their existing store
so they could sell grocery items and produce.
City Council chambers
in City Hall were filled to capacity before the
meeting started at 7pmThursday April 22. A TV screen
high up on the wall in the lobby displayed the
action and folding chairs crammed in the lobby
filled that space. It was SRO everywhere. Several
police officers barred admission to the council
chambers unless attendees already had a seat guarded
by their seatmate.
Click here for the rest of the story
Press Release:
Sonoma State University
Tuesday, March 11, 2010 4:30 pm
The Academic Senate of Sonoma State University has
joined the Sonoma Chapter of the California Faculty
Association in voting to oppose the expansion of the
Rohnert Park Wal-Mart into a SuperCenter.
In the Senate's vote, which occurred today, the
resolution passed nearly unanimously, with only one
opposition vote. The CFA Chapter voted on March 3
and passed a similar resolution unanimously.
The Senate's resolution states that the body opposes
the expansion of the Rohnert Park Wal-Mart "because
of the adverse effect this expansion will have on
the community in which Sonoma State University is
located."
The rationale for the resolution explains that,
while many local residents may be attracted to being
able to purchase groceries more cheaply than at
present, there are significantly high costs to such
low prices. These costs include:
+An adverse effect on the labor market in the area,
since Wal-Mart's typical positions include few or no
benefits and pay so far below a living wage that
employees must rely on government-funded services;
+Driving other local grocery stores (such as Pacific
Market or Oliver's) out of business, with the
attendant urban blight spreading through the
shopping centers they anchor;
+bypassing local suppliers, many of which will be
unable to survive without access to customers; and
+Funneling local dollars spent on groceries out of
the area instead of recirculating them within the
economy of Sonoma County.
Although local city governments are struggling
financially, an expanded Wal-Mart would not bring in
significant additional revenue since it would be
selling primarily groceries, which are not subject
to California sales tax.
The Rohnert Park Planning Commission will consider
Wal-Mart's request for an expansion permit in the
near future. A party that is unhappy with the
decision of the Planning Commission may appeal the
decision to the Rohnert Park City Council.
For more information contact Professor Rick Luttmann,
Department of Mathematics,
664-2543 and
rick.luttman@sonoma.edu.
Down the
Wal-Mart Low Road: What Are the Costs of a
Supercenter?
Living Wage Coalition of Sonoma County
Winter 2009-2010 Newsletter
by Martin J. Bennett
Wal-Mart recently announced plans to convert its
existing discount store in Rohnert Park to Sonoma
County's first 'supercenter.' Many cash-strapped
cities are tempted to hastily approve retail
projects that can generate- substantial sales tax
revenue given the current economic downturn.
However, we should pause to consider, not only the
benefits, but also the costs of the proposed
supercenter for Rohnert Park and Cotati.
In late March the Rohnert Park City Council will
consider Wal-Mart's application to expand the
existing Wal-Mart discount store in that city to a
supercenter.
A supercenter is a 200,000 square foot store that
sells both general merchandise and groceries. Since
1988, Wal-Mart has opened 2300 supercenters
nationwide. Wal-Mart announced in 2002 that it would
build more than forty of these megastores in
California. By 2008 thirty-one were built, with
organized grassroots opposition and environmental
lawsuits blocking the others.
Wal-Mart is now the nation's largest grocer and
pharmacy, with sales exceeding the combined total of
major competitors, including Target, Safeway,
Albertsons, Kohl's, and Kroger. How did Sam Walton
develop a rural, southern discount store into the
planet's largest retailer and the nation's largest
employer?
According to UC Santa Barbara historian Nelson
Lichtenstein in his new book, The Retail Revolution:
How Wal-Mart Created A Brave New World of Business,
the main reason for Wal-Mart's phenomenal success is
containment of labor costs by a relentless downward
pressure on wages and benefits, and a near-perfect
record thwarting unionization.
Most Wal-Mart workers are the 'working poor' in
America. According to the company's own reports, the
average wage for a full-time Wal-Mart worker in 2007
was $10.51 an hour. The average wage of a Wal-Mart
employee is 26 percent less than other large
merchandise stores, and 18 percent less than large
grocery stores, according to the New York University
Brennan Center.
Kaiser Family Foundation reports that less than 50
percent of Wal-Mart employees receive health-care
benefits. Full-time workers must wait six months to
receive medical benefits, and part-time workers wait
two years. Half the work force turns over annually.
As a result, part-time employees, who are more than
one third of the work force, rarely receive
benefits. For others, high deductibles, copays, and
coverage limitations make the company-provided
health plan unaffordable.
Wal-Mart ensures that wages and benefits remain low
by a systematic, company-wide policy to suppress
unions. A report by Human Rights Watch about
Wal-Mart concluded, "while many American companies
use weak U.S. laws to stop workers from organizing,
the retail giant stands out for the sheer magnitude
and aggressiveness of its anti-union apparatus."
Between 1998-2003 the National Labor Relations Board
issued 94 complaints and found that Wal-Mart
illegally fired workers for union activity, forced
workers to attend anti-union meetings and video
screenings, spied on workers who supported
unionization, and claimed workers would lose pay
raises and benefits or the store would shut down if
the employees voted for a union.
Not one Wal-Mart store is unionized in the U.S. When
Quebec workers voted for representation by the
United Food and Commercial Workers in 2005, the
company closed the store.
What are the costs when a Wal-Mart supercenter opens
in a community?
First, good middle-class jobs are replaced by
poverty-wage jobs. Grocery prices at Wal-Mart are 15
percent lower than those of competing firms, and
half of these major grocery chains, like Safeway,
Raley's, and Albertsons, are unionized. The 'union
premium' for combined pay and benefits is 30 percent
more than nonunion. In Southern Nevada, Wal-Mart
opened sixteen supercenters, and by 2002 1400 union
jobs were lost when Raley's closed eighteen stores.
According to Nelson Lichtenstein, 13,000 traditional
supermarkets were closed and twenty-five regional
chains forced into bankruptcy from 1992-2003 due to
Wal-Mart.
Second, the taxpayers end up providing public
assistance for Wal-Mart workers. A 2004 study by the
UC Berkeley Labor Center, "The Hidden Costs of
Wal-Mart," concludes that uninsured Wal-Mart
employees in California rely on programs like Medi-Cal
and Healthy Families at a cost of $32 million a year
to the taxpayer. The report also demonstrates that
Wal-Mart workers earning poverty wages rely on
federal and state programs like the Earned Income
Tax Credit, Food Stamps, Section 8 subsidized
housing, and child-care assistance to make ends
meet, at a cost of $54 million per year.
Third, local merchants are hurt when Wal-Mart enters
a community. In 1995, economist Kenneth Stone found
that, a decade after the opening of a Wal-Mart in
rural Iowa, 60 percent of the retail sales captured
by Wal-Mart came from existing retailers. Hundreds
of grocery, apparel, hardware, and drug stores
closed. University of Missouri economist Emek Basker
examined county-level employment impacts of Wal-Mart
from 1977-1998. She demonstrated that, for every one
hundred new jobs created by Wal-Mart, fifty retail
jobs and twenty wholesale jobs were lost over the
next five years.
Moreover, a 2007 study by UC Berkeley economists
Arin Dube and T. William Lester calculated that,
"every new Wal-Mart in a county reduced the combined
or aggregate earnings of retail workers by around
1.5 percent" as competition from Wal-Mart decreases
both average pay rates and total employment in the
local retail sector.
Sonoma State students employed in grocery and retail
will be directly affected by a new Wal-Mart
supercenter: stores nearby such as Pacific Market
will certainly close, as the draft EIR notes.
Raley's and Oliver's will face stiff competition
from the supercenter while employee earnings will
decline across the retail sector in Rohnert Park and
Cotati.
This is an appropriate moment for an informed public
dialogue, and a county -wide mobilization to oppose
the megastore proposed for Rohnert Park. The Living
Wage Coalition has joined with independent grocers
and small businesses in Rohnert Park, the North Bay
Labor Council, Sonoma County Conservation Action,
the Sierra Club Sonoma Group, Go Local Sonoma County
and the United Food and Commercial Workers to urge
that the Rohnert Park City Council deny Wal-Mart's
application for a supercenter.
Update:
Wal-Mart has appealed the decision by the Rohnert
Park Planning Commission to deny their application
for a Wal-Mart supercenter. We anticipate that the
appeal will come to the Rohnert Park city council in
late June or early July. Please check our web site
and we will soon post the exact date for the city
council meeting:
http://:www.livingwagesonoma.org
Martin J. Bennett teaches American history at Santa
Rosa Junior College, serves as a Co-Chair of the
Living Wage Coalition and serves on the board of
Sonoma County Conservation Action.
|